Restore our climate. Harvest the atmospheric CO2 surplus , producing 300 km3 algae-mass (2kg/l)
(instead of merely diminishing CO2-output), and even the oceans accidity is restored !
A 1 square-mile production site can accomplish this in 10 to 20 years.
The extra amount CO2 we add to the atmosphere coming decades, may cause a need to prolong this effort !

I felt a more colourfull presentation might inform and mobilise people less aquainted with this solution
(still do : )

Continue to Healing Circles

original estimate, adjusted to 30% oceanic absorption, and 'new' figures:

967 billion tons CO2-surplus are bound in 351 billion tons biomass (2kg/l) being 176 km3 ,
another 120 km3 binds the CO2 surplus the oceans will meanwhile release , total 296 km3 !


Continue to Healing Circles


In 2018 all Ice back on North Pole ! Here's How !

Get all CO2 surplus out of the atmosphere in one year  (or ten years).
In a 10 square mile production site producing algae mass   ( 300 km3 algae-mass at 2 kg/l ) Easy and cheap .
 
 
Restore our Climate !
 
 
Green Gold harvesting (300 km3 to 1200 km3 biomass)
 
Don't just limit the climate-damage, diminishing CO2 output ! 
But restore our Climate ! Absorb and bind the surplus CO2 .
- Green Gold harvesting (300km3 algae-mass)  restores our climate
(and ocean acidity !) regardless of our CO2 Output ! (OK. a little effort extra ..)
 
(Please forward as you see fit.)
 
Time to adopt life on earth as our child.... Time to adopt the world as our child !
 
 
Restore our Climate !
 
 
Green Gold harvesting (300 km3 to 1200 km3 biomass)
 
restores our climate
( and ocean acidity !)
regardless of CO2 Output !
 
(we'll always have Paris ...)
 
This can even be done by just a couple of countries or even 1 company !
(We can do this in 10 to 20 years 
 on a one square mile production-site !)
 
All this delicious CO2 surplus in the atmosphere begging to become high value biomass building materials (and other endurables) for free ! Even subsidized ! (The price per ton CO2 is currently rising to E50,- if you harvest it out of the atmosphere or prevent its output into the atmosphere !)

 (2.75 ton CO2  is bound in 1 ton biomass (44 tons CO2 is bound in exactly 16 tons CH4 or roughly in 16 tons CxH2x+2, being roughly the composition of biomass), 1 ton biomass = 2 m3 regular to 0.5 m3 algae-mass )

Slightly longer summary :
 
 
Our climate restored in ten years ! (simply biomass storing) (better in 20 years,  giving remigrating species an extra chance to succeed ?)
 
Our climate restored in ten years, storing biomass (165 km3 algae to bind the CO2-surplus in the atmosphere) (and another 124 km3 algae to bind the CO2-surplus that the oceans will release into the atmosphere) (total 289 km3 algae bio-mass , if we like, produced in a one square mile plant/production-site).
 
Better divided over several countries solving logistics problems, this installation promises a yearly production of 16.5 km3 algae biomass, also after this ten or twenty year project, to be used for all kinds of purposes: food,oil, gas, all oilderivates, building materials etc…this whole conduct may well pay for itself. Better overproduce the yearly quotum to be stored, perhabs instantly in endurable building materials , start profits right away, and shift gradually to total utilization of this CO2 harvest (algae bio-mass).
 
The endurables need to endure only 25 years in fact, and be recycables ofcourse , cause by then the climate is restored (i.e the CO2 degree in the atmosphere will be back to the 1600ths !), and the production capacity can be used to replace the possibly deteriorating endurables that store the CO2 surplus we originally extracted from fossile fuels and released into the atmosphere. (it's all about refossilising CO2)
 
Production-units in container-size may help devide this solution over the world, possibly combined with container-units creating sweet from saltwater (also depending on the algea-type that's being cultivated). Purple led lights on increasing surfaces matching increase in algae densities may serve to produce these desired quantities.
 
These products may replace palm-oil, crops and cattlefields, save ecological systems and return our world to nature in a restored climate!

Possibly production-towers, pyled containers interconnected, may serve industries to bind their CO2 output and make a profit as well, selling endurable building materials and meet the CO2-quota .. Better than storing CO2, this mass stores 4 times as much CO2 without dangerous pressures 40 to 57 atmosphere, but at zero atmosphere overpressure !
 
And beware of overly Global Cooling! Harvesting CO2 from the atmosphere may well turn out to be overly profitable and may cause need to burn or consume some of our stored algae-mass!
 
This solution does not address the pollution and public health-hazard that comes along with the general CO2 output. Complete burning into CO2 or alternative solar and wind (and geothermal, H2 burning etc.) energy do. This obligation still remains!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(numbers from 2012 adjusted with 200 gt CO2 emission in the five year since of which  88 gt in atmosphere and 60 gt in oceans )

Human induced carbon emissions since the industrial revolution have totaled almost 2,200 Gt CO2.

The figures for the land, ocean and atmospheric sinks describe where these 2,200 Gt COhave gone.  The three major sinks for human carbon emissions are the atmosphere (44%), the ocean (30%) and the land (26%).

The (879 +88=) 967 Gt of human carbon emissions that have stayed in the atmosphere since 1750 are thus equal to an increase in atmospheric concentrations of 125 ppm (113 +12) and 660 Gt  in the oceans.

Read more at http://shrinkthatfootprint.com/carbon-emissions-and-sinks#KCio5uHWCbkcj9S7.99
(copy-paste in your browser)

 
wikipedia
As a result, carbon dioxide has gradually accumulated in the atmosphere, and as of 2013, its concentration is almost 43% above pre-industrial levels.[9][19] Various techniques have been proposed for removing excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in carbon dioxide sinks. Currently about half of the carbon dioxide released from the burning of fossil fuels is not absorbed by vegetation and the oceans and remains in the atmosphere.[86]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_in_Earth's_atmosphere#Anthropogenic_CO2_emissions



[[[[[[[[[---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I wondered how much biomass would bind the CO2 surplus and calculated by heart ppm's  and atmosphere content (if it were 1 atm. pressure average). Since that calculation proved so accurate based on the presented numbers from the internet, though I 'humbly' omitted my achievement, nevertheless, that satisfaction about my approach may have caused me to overlook the possibility of checking the number of billion tons (gigatons GT) CO2 science seems to agree is responsible for the current global warming since 1750. This renders a much more favourable and accessable calculation ...so the next approach is rather nerdy, but produces about the same optimistic message:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[ 4,200 million km3 is the total 'effective' volume of the atmosphere (if it were 1 atmosphere pressure average) , 120 parts CO2 per million surplus= 504,000 km3 CO2 surplus in the atmosphere . ]
 
(2.75 tons CO2 is bound in 1 ton bio-mass, = 0.5 to 2 m3 bio-mass (while as gas it has a volume of 1530 m3, at 25 degrees celsius 
 
(4,200 * 120504,000 km3 CO2 surplus in the atmosphere, would weigh slightly over 907 billion tons indeed, if the atmospheric CO2 were 25 degrees celsius average, to be bound in around 330 billion tons biomass, being 660 km3 regular biomass or fourfold heavy 165 km3 algae-mass . The oceans will release their CO2 surplus into the atmosphere and we will need to store another portion of 124 km3 algae-biomass as well … So double the effort or get this job done in twenty years, which may prove to be favourable to many remigrating species )
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
calculations on websites :
An estimated 30–40% of the CO2 released by humans into the atmosphere dissolves into oceans, rivers and lakes.[11][12] which contributes to ocean acidification.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_in_Earth's_atmosphere
 
Here calculated CO2 surplus :  40% in the atmosphere, 40% in the oceans, 20% in land-vegetation, (a form of endurable biomass) by now largely adjusted to :  44% in the atmosphere, 30% in the oceans, 26% in land-vegetation (hopefully a form of endurable biomass)
 
Absorption rates can vary, but approximately 40% of global anthropogenic (human) carbon dioxide emissions remain in the atmosphere, the rest is taken up by vegetation on land or absorbed by the world’s oceans, currently in about equal proportions.
http://www.global-greenhouse-warming.com/ocean-acidification.html
[We know that the carbon dioxide is a direct result of burning fossil fuels, as unlike the make up of living organisms, fossil fuels contain little or none of the radioactive form of carbon, that is, the carbon 14 isotope, which has eight neutrons in the nucleus rather than the usual six. Fossil fuels also display a unique ratio of the two stable isotopes of carbon (carbon 12 and 13). The combustion of these fuels thus leaves a distinctive isotopic signature in the atmosphere. So no one can question where the growing surplus of carbon dioxide comes from ]
 
Volume of the atmosphere in a state of average 1 bar :
The "effective volume" of the Earth's atmosphere is about 4.2 billion cubic kilometers. This figure is the surface area of the Earth (509 million square kilometers) times the "effective thickness" of the atmosphere (8.2 kilometers, or about 27,000 ft). The effective thickness and volume are what the thickness and volume of the atmosphere would be if the entire atmosphere were at sea level conditions.  (http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_volume_of_Earth%27s_atmosphere)
 
concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased markedly since the Industrial Revolution, from 280 ppm to 400 ppm as of 2015.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_in_Earth's_atmosphere
 
(so 120 ppm, 120 CO2 parts surplus per million atmospheric parts, for atmospheric gasses also volume parts per million volume parts, km3 per million km3)
 
4,200 million cubic km is the total effective volume of the atmosphere (if it were 1 atmosphere pressure average) , 120 parts CO2 per million surplus= 504,000 km3 CO2 surplus in the atmosphere .
(2.75 tons CO2 , volume 1530 m3 gas, at 25 degrees celsius , is bound in 1 ton bio-mass, volume 0.5 m3 algae to 2 m3 regular bio-mass  (binding the C , releasing the O2 largely into the atmosphere)  
 
(4,200 * 120 = 504,000 km3 CO2 surplus in the atmosphere, would weigh slightly over 907 billion tons if they were 25 degrees celsius average, to be bound in around 330 billion tons biomass, being 660 km3 regular biomass or fourfold heavy 165 km3 algae-mass . The oceans will release their CO2 surplus into the atmosphere and we will need to store another portion of 165 km3 biomass as well … So dubbel the effort or do this job in twenty years, which may prove to be favourable to many remigrating species )
(2.75 ton CO2 occupies 1529.55 m3 of volume  –at 25 degrees Celsius- [see below] and is bound in 1 ton biomass (44 tons CO2 is bound in exactly 16 tons CH4 or roughly in 16 tons CxH2x+2, being roughly the composition of biomass), 1 ton biomass = 2 m3 regular or 0.5 m3 algae-mass binding 1530 m3 CO2 ! 0.5 km3 algae-mass binding 1530 km3 CO2,  165 km3 algae-mass binding 330 * 1529,55 km3 = 504,751.5 km3 CO2 - 'effective' km3 CO2 at 1 atmosphere pressure, containing the total CO2-surplus in our atmosphere -.)
 
It seems rather silly to be so precise at 25 degrees celsius , when the relevant average temperature is unknown. (likely, the lower this av. temp. the more CO2 molecules present in those 504,000 km3 and the more algae mass is needed to bind them all)
 
The fact that such an average temperature is hardly available on the internet (15 to 33 degrees, barely documented) seems to indicate that this calculation is not current in climate-science. The treatment of the climate-crisis indicates likewise. (Urgenda , Obama, no-one suggests this - realistic- solution).
 
Volume calculation of one ton CO2

One mole CO2 = 44.0g     (CO2 = 12.0g + 32.0g = 44.0g)
One ton contains 22730 moles of CO2    (1,000,000g / 44.0g/mole)
One mole is 24.47L     (Boyle's law at 25°C and 1 atmosphere pressure)
Volume of one ton CO2 = 22730moles × 24.47L/mole = 556200L = 556.2m³
One ton of CO2 occupies 556.2m³ of volume.  
(http://www.icbe.com/carbondatabase/CO2volumecalculation.asp)
 (2.75 ton CO2 occupies 1529.55 m3 of volume  –at 25 degrees Celsius- and is bound in 1 ton biomass (44 tons CO2 is bound in exactly 16 tons CH4 or roughly in 16 tons CxH2x+2, being roughly the composition of biomass), 1 ton biomass = 2 m3 regular or 0.5 m3 algae-mass binding 1530 m3 CO2 ! 0.5 km3 algae-mass binding 1530 km3, 165 km3 algae-mass binding 330 * 1529.55 km3 = 504,751.5 km3 CO2 - 'effective' km3 CO2 at 1 atmosphere pressure, containing the total CO2-surplus in our atmosphere - .)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------]]]]]]]]

.

The nutrients may be expensive or scarce, but scientist can help select the most suitable algae, perhabs a variety , equalling out the nutrients we need to store in those algae. We don't need to measure precisely the (a)mount we store, together with green deserts and other efforts, we simply measure wether we approach the desired CO2 280 ppm
atmospheric particles ....! And witness the return of butterflies..... With crops and cattlecopies from containers , we don't need to poison our regular plants anymore..! We shouldn't. Let's not.



Finally we may wonder wether the ocean's accidity requires more concern than glabal warming, that the current situation is already irreversably killing life in the oceans as we know it, taking the rest of nature with it in it's fall..  We may be in much more of a hurry than we already think.

http://nos.nl/artikel/2088767-nieuwe-studie-wanneer-wordt-2-graden-opwarming-bereikt.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
additional tips :
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Electrical Towing Jet-Drones :
Schiphol and all airports pollution free !
 
(Since the first electrical aircraft crossed the Channel , London-Paris, kerosine-free, no CO2-output :)

When the towing trucks get electrical, one might also apply pulling startcables electricly operated , diminishing the kerosine spill at take off, and , ultimately , tow the planes into the air with electrical towing jets that might return in a drone-like manner to their loading docks, diminishing  need for landingspace and risk for surroundings. Planes might land on their own strength, for now, since they don't burn a lot of kerosine to do so....
 
Since this solution works we may also apply floating docks on the oceans and stations elsewhere on the continents and have the pulling and towing of planes taken over high up in the air by freshly charged jetdrones, using traditional planes in the transition to clean transportation !

------------------------------------------------------------------

Complete burning into CO2 in combustion engines (= regular gasoline and diesel engines, motopets and 'brommobielen')
allows building schools and blocks alongside traffic, nowadays forbidden due to traffic-pollution,
ends the extreme healthhazard in traffic we're all subjected to when driving:

A simple moist sponge in the air intake of any combustion engine serves as an evaporater of small condens or mist particles
(moist with water and a bit cleaning-ethanol to ensure desired evaporation)
these tiny waterdrops catalize the burning in the cilinders into complete burning , into only H2O and CO2, much like the fireman's waterhose enhances the fire, which is why he only keeps the surroundings wet to kill the fire, while water in the midst would only stimulate the flames.
(the NOx problem in the recent VW software-scandal wasn't an issue back in 1989 when I encounterd this invention. Of course the electrical way of driving seems the best overall solution ! )
The sponge material came from motorcar-airfilter-foam, the wetness came through little tubes and squeezed bottles or windscreen sprinklers, paper-airfilters would clogg the airstream when wet and had to be replaced/removed or simply cut large holes in them.

Everyone was impressed back then. It was commonly observed by lorrydrivers when entering a mist. We could sit in closed carboxes next to running engines without the slightest smell or problem. White paper handkerchiefs stayed white, elsewhise blackened by small particles from engines that weren't even allowed to be measured because they destroyed the instruments with their pollution ! Even improved with this invention they were refused by the authorities to be measured. The handkerchief test had to suffice. Now politicians should find their way to implement this simplicity. At least in existing hazards like motopets and diesel two-tacts etc.   We should. Let's.

There's an invention of twirling the air in intake, speeding it up, like water out of a bottle leaves faster when twirled, allowing better burning with sufficient air. A great relief for the crews that suffer less noise and vibrations from the smoothly running engines. But still not implemented or stimulated or recommended by politicians. A combination of these two inventions might bring fundamental change to the public-health situation. !

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continue on straatwijs.nl